VPN Use Legality

The VPN Use Legality carries 1 published figure read from 1 source's own page, from 51 to 51 week, read 17 October 2026.

51 to 51 week Range of the published figures 1 published figures, not one market: read the rows
1 Published figures from 1 source page, read 20 Oct 2026
2 of 13 Sources read that publish one 15% publish a figure at all
  1. Gambling Act 2005 section 33 (providing facilities for gambling)51 week
Every published figure, highest first.
Table view
RowValue
Gambling Act 2005 section 33 (providing facilities for gambling)51 week

2 of the 13 named sources read in full publish a figure; 11 publish none, read 17 October 2026.

Every figure, with its source

One row per published figure: the figure as the source's own page publishes it, the page, and the day it was read. A figure that is not on a page we read is not on this one.

The sentence each figure was read from (2)

Read in full, publishes no figure

11 named sources were read in full on the dates shown and print no usable figure. They are counted, never filled in.

Methodology

Every row is a verbatim sentence read from the named source's own page through our fetch service on the date shown, hash-pinned to the stored read (the sha of the page's visible text; the raw page is mirrored to R2).

2 of the 13 named sources that could be read published a usable figure; 11 published none and are recorded as not published, never filled in; 0 could not be read (blocked, dead or unreachable) and count nowhere.

The headline figures (median, minimum, maximum, quartiles) are over ONE figure per source in week (a source's median where its page yielded several accepted sentences), so N counts sources, never sentences; 10 candidate sentence(s) were refused by a reviewer with the reason recorded.

The fuller derivation this dataset is chartered to grow into (not yet what the figures above are; they are each source's own published figure as read): one row per jurisdiction per activity: the statute or licence condition, what it binds (the operator, the customer, or both), and the penalty, quoted verbatim from the regulator or the statute with its effective date; the derivation is the cross-jurisdiction table showing where the duty falls on the OPERATOR and the customer commits no offence against where the customer does - the distinction every consumer guide on this subject blurs

10 candidate sentences on these pages were refused by a reviewer; each refusal and its reason is recorded in the review ledger.

Sources (13)
Cite or embed this figure

Cite or embed this figure

The VPN Use Legality carries 1 published figure read from 1 source's own page, from 51 to 51 week, read 17 October 2026.

2 of the 13 named sources read in full publish a figure; 11 publish none, read 17 October 2026.

Cite as: "VPNCompareHQ VPN Use Legality", updated 2026-10-20, https://vpncomparehq.com/datasets/vpn-use-legality/.

Embed this figure (plain HTML, no scripts)

51 to 51 week

1 published figures, VPN Use Legality, across 1 source, read 17 October 2026

Source: VPNCompareHQ VPN Use Legality

Download the CSV (2 rows, computed 2026-10-20)

Which VPN do I need?Compare VPN prices